Intending to shield and heal the earth.

[David Smith]

Is the magnetosphere fluctuating to much? What can we do about it? Use our consciousness and the power of intention to shield the earth from harm. Who agrees? Let us all together now intend to shield the earth from harm. Are there other destructive forces threatening earth? Intending to shield. Shielding. Intending to heal. Healing. Visualize a protective shield around the earth. Visualize the earth being healed.

[Connie Stevens]

I think you would enjoy the Global Coherence Initiative if you aren't already participating. (free) http://www.glcoherence.org/

[David Smith]

Thanks Connie. I had not heard of that. Its interesting, although I am skeptical of sites that sell electronic devices like the emWave. It looks like they are bringing together people from all over the world to raise global coherence to take us through the "shift". Its all very interesting. We all join together by collectively and individually intending to heal and protect our precious earth regardless of what sites on the internet we visit. What is your perspective on the Global Coherence Initiative? I am considering starting my own initiative that will come at it from a different angle. I haven't decided yet about joining GCI. Again thanks so much for the reply and I am so happy to know about GCI.

[David Smith]

Thank you Glenda. I hope the rest of this community will see fit to join in on this one. I sense a great deal of healing energy in you Glenda.

[pluralone]

Greetings, David -

Since fluctuations in the magnetosphere (and other types of energy) are naturally occurring, I'm not certain they should be interfered with. All things change and transform; perhaps these fluctuations are exactly as they should be.

I've already said this in a reply to another post, so please forgive me for repeating it here: For some time, I've been working with unconditional love energy to support the healing of people, other planetary life forms, spirit beings and the planet. I preface all such work with "If it will promote the highest good..." because sometimes what appears to be a bad or imbalanced thing is actually something that needs to happen in order for spiritual evolution to take place. So as I support the shielding and healing of the Earth, I keep my intent in mind to not interfere with what must be.
plur

[Suzanne Giraud]

100%, thank you, :-)))
Totally from Love,
Suzanne

[David Smith]

Thank you pluralone for your reply. Working with unconditional love is a good thing. I do not think that you need to preface such a thing with IF. Of course unconditional love is a good thing. Of course protecting and healing the planet is a good thing. I could go on and on. If a car is coming and you are in the way - Do get out of the way of the car. It is not a good idea to replace common sense for humility, both are very important. Have you ever begun a meditation or whatever method you use for unconditional love, and start with "If it will promote the highest good", and then stop and say I better not today because it does not promote the highest good today? Lets say a big asteroid is headed toward a planet populated with intelligent life in a nearby solar system and we knew about it. Would you:
a. Wonder that if the asteroid hits the planet it may be for the planets highest good. b. Hope it does not hit the planet.
c. Use the power of intention to divert the asteroid and shield the planet. or
d. It just doesn't matter because we don't know what to think about that planet.

[pluralone]

I appreciate your feedback, David.

To clarify: I was sharing my own personal method of ... well, of what I do. I share as an offering of support, not in an attempt to define what should be done.

When I do energy work, naturally I think I know what needs to be done. As I am not all-knowing, I won't presume to think I'm always right on that point. So, for instance, in your example I would answer:

e. Do what I could to divert what seems to me would be a catastrophe, but I would preface my work with "If it will promote the highest good".

Because, you know, I really wouldn't be able to see the larger picture, why the planet was headed toward destruction, what purpose its destruction might serve. Destruction, death, etc, in the larger scheme of things, aren't necessarily catastrophic except in how they're perceived. These things - destruction, death, etc - are transformations. Perhaps the only ones who see them as catastrophic are those who are left behind. I don't know. But I do know I personally don't want to support the interruption of the natural flow of things unless such an interruption will promote the highest good. And I just wouldn't know for sure whether it would be best for that planet to be destroyed or for it to be saved. Offering my support for it being saved is something I can do, with the preface in place; stepping in and playing god (sans preface) is not. But that's just me.

As a fallible energy worker, I may not know what will actually promote the highest good, even though I use unconditional love energy in my work. I could be wrong when I think I know what's needed. Making mistakes is part of life, of course, but I feel the preface serves to limit mistakes on my part.

Sure as heck doesn't hurt anything.
plur

[David Smith]

I see your point pluralone. You do not wish to do any harm and I respect that and agree with it. When it is time for the magnetosphere to shift it will happen. I am not trying to prevent any natural occurances. I am trying to lessen adverse effects, avert catastrophe, and add my healing energy. When I meditate I do it whole heartedly, I don't hold back, and I try and remain positive. I don't think I have the ability to hinder evolution. Your preface is very respectful and a humble thing to say. During the meditation I stay way to focused to use a word like "if", as I feel it might cast doubt on what I am doing. But as a preface, I think you are right. It is a very good preface.

[pluralone]

I think it comes down to how it feels and what is the intent personally. For me, there is no hesitation or holding back in clearly and completely stating my intent, but I do understand how this could be perceived as such. It is not - for me - a statement of doubt in any way; it is an affirmation of my intent to work in harmony with whatever will promote the highest good. No holding back, no doubts.
plur

[David Smith]

For us to avert catastrophe and heal the planet by using whatever abilities we have within us would not be unnatural because we ourselves are part of nature. So when I said (in a previous reply above), that I don't want to prevent natural occurances, - I also mean that I do want to fascilitate good natural occurances in order to prevent bad natural occurances. Thanks so much for replies pluralone, you are very kind.

[pluralone]

I think that "good" and "bad" are relative terms. If large upheavals are parts of a necessary transition, they serve a purpose. I personally don't think we're capable of completely derailing such an event if it's necessary; on the other hand, if it would server the highest good for this event to be averted then I do think it's possible. I just can't speak for this universe or the people in it to say whether the magnetosphere is fluctuating "too much" or if the transitions it brings are necessary, so I do my part (in my own particular way) to support a balance. I think we're pretty much doing the same work, David; we're just approaching it from different perspectives.

[David Smith]

Thanks pluralone. You are very wise.